Performance Reviews

Breaking the Link Between Annual Reviews and Compensation

When annual reviews are tied to raises and bonuses, culture suffers. How to break the link between reviews and compensation.
Published
October 2026
Table of Contents

As companies continue to evolve, the way in which they evaluate and manage the performance of their employees is also changing. One of the biggest challenges faced by many companies is the way in which annual performance reviews become closely tied to conversations around compensation - bonuses, raises, and merit increases. This can lead to disappointment and frustration when that increase doesn't come, and can also put pressure on decision-makers when it comes to awarding salary increases. Demotivating employees is the last thing executives want to do.

Separating Performance and Salary Conversations

To address this, many companies are now moving away from the traditional annual performance review and towards a continuous performance management process. This approach focuses on developing employees throughout the year, rather than just evaluating them at the end of the year. This allows managers and executives to provide more targeted and effective feedback and to also identify areas where employees need improvement. Additionally, it enables them to award raises and promotions at a time that is best for the company and/or timely for the employee, rather than just following the traditional annual review cycle.

Focusing on Continuous Improvement

To implement this approach, managers and executives should focus on making performance management and evaluation a continuous process throughout the year by setting regular performance goals for employees and providing regular feedback. It is also important to involve employees in the process by encouraging them to set their own goals and participate in self-assessments.

By following a more continuous approach to performance reviews, companies can create a more fair and equitable system for determining compensation and career progression while also ensuring the best interest of the company is taken into account.

Latest Posts
Employee Engagement

Pulse Survey Software for Slack and Microsoft Teams: What to Look For

Choosing pulse survey software for 50 to 300 people? What to look for, mistakes to avoid, and how to run pulse surveys in Slack or Microsoft Teams.
Read post
Resources

How to Run a Performance Review Cycle in Microsoft Teams

A four-week plan for running performance reviews inside Microsoft Teams, for companies of 50 to 300 people with no HR ops team and no new app to learn.
Read post
Resources

How to Choose Review Software for 100 People With No HR

Choosing review software for 100 people with no HR? Run a full cycle in a week, meet managers in Slack or Teams, and ask these demo questions.
Read post

Want performance reviews for you team, but without the hassle?
Try WorkStory now.

Performance review software that actually finishes on time