Performance Reviews

Breaking the Link Between Annual Reviews and Compensation

One of the biggest challenges faced by many companies is the way in which annual performance reviews become closely tied to conversations around bonuses, raises, and merit increases. This can lead to disappointment, frustration, and have a negative impact on culture.
Published
March 2024

As companies continue to evolve, the way in which they evaluate and manage the performance of their employees is also changing. One of the biggest challenges faced by many companies is the way in which annual performance reviews become closely tied to conversations around compensation - bonuses, raises, and merit increases. This can lead to disappointment and frustration when that increase doesn't come, and can also put pressure on decision-makers when it comes to awarding salary increases. Demotivating employees is the last thing executives want to do.

Separating Performance and Salary Conversations

To address this, many companies are now moving away from the traditional annual performance review and towards a continuous performance management process. This approach focuses on developing employees throughout the year, rather than just evaluating them at the end of the year. This allows managers and executives to provide more targeted and effective feedback and to also identify areas where employees need improvement. Additionally, it enables them to award raises and promotions at a time that is best for the company and/or timely for the employee, rather than just following the traditional annual review cycle.

Focusing on Continuous Improvement

To implement this approach, managers and executives should focus on making performance management and evaluation a continuous process throughout the year by setting regular performance goals for employees and providing regular feedback. It is also important to involve employees in the process by encouraging them to set their own goals and participate in self-assessments.

By following a more continuous approach to performance reviews, companies can create a more fair and equitable system for determining compensation and career progression while also ensuring the best interest of the company is taken into account.

Latest Posts
Performance Reviews

The Evolution of Performance Management Part Two

The second post in a series written by Tracie Sponenberg, covering the evolution of performance management, from the beginning until now. This article covers how technology reshaped performance management in the 2000s—and why digitizing processes didn’t always mean better human development.
Read post
Performance Reviews

The Evolution of Performance Management Part One

Written by Tracie Sponenberg, Strategic HR Consultant & People-First Culture Strategist, this first post in a series traces the early evolution of performance management—from industrial-era systems to 1990s corporate practices. It explores how the original focus became overshadowed by legal compliance, setting the stage for change in the decades to follow.
Read post
Performance Reviews

Arguments For & Against Pay Increases Based on Performance

Should raises be tied to performance reviews? Explore the pros, cons, and modern alternatives HR leaders are considering.
Read post

Want performance reviews for you team, but without the hassle?
Try WorkStory now.